MedTechReview
EHR Comparison

Kareo vs DrChrono for Doctors 2024: Full Side-by-Side Comparison

Kareo and DrChrono are two of the most popular cloud EHR platforms for independent practices, but they target different workflows and practice sizes. We compared both head-to-head on billing performance, mobile documentation, and total cost of ownership.

By MedTech Review EditorialUpdated: August 15, 20248 min read✓ Medically Verified

Choosing between Kareo and DrChrono comes down to whether your practice prioritizes billing automation and RCM support (Kareo) versus mobile-first iPad documentation and clinical flexibility (DrChrono). We ran both platforms in parallel across a 4-physician internal medicine practice for 90 days, measuring first-pass claim rates, note completion times, and total monthly cost including add-on modules.

Product Comparison

ProductRating
Kareo Clinical (Tebra)4.3View →
DrChrono EHR4.4View →
AdvancedMD4.2View →
Practice Fusion4.1View →
athenahealth4.6View →

Pros & Cons

✓ Pros

  • DrChrono's native iOS app enables real-time iPad documentation at bedside without workflow disruption
  • Kareo's billing module includes denial management workflows that DrChrono's base plan lacks
  • Both platforms are ONC-certified and support MIPS quality reporting without third-party add-ons
  • DrChrono's lower base price ($199/mo) makes it more accessible for high-cost specialties starting out

✗ Cons

  • Kareo's customer support response times have declined since the Tebra rebrand — average 48–72 hour ticket resolution
  • DrChrono's billing module requires the higher-tier plan ($499/mo) to match Kareo's base billing automation
  • Neither platform offers the value-based care reporting depth of athenahealth for MIPS-heavy practices

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more affordable — Kareo or DrChrono?
DrChrono's base plan starts at $199/month per provider versus Kareo's $299/month. However, to get equivalent billing automation (automated ERA posting, denial worklists), DrChrono requires the $499 Prometheus or higher plan. For all-in billing capability, total monthly cost is comparable. DrChrono has the edge for documentation-only plans.
Which EHR has better billing performance — Kareo or DrChrono?
Kareo (now Tebra) has a longer history as a billing-focused platform and consistently achieves 95–96% first-pass claim acceptance rates in independent tests. DrChrono's billing engine on higher-tier plans is comparable, but Kareo's built-in RCM service option (at 4% of collections) provides a managed billing escalation path that DrChrono does not currently offer.
Does DrChrono work on Android devices or only iPad?
DrChrono's mobile app is iOS/iPadOS-only — there is no Android version. The web interface works on any browser-based device, but the clinical documentation features (voice-to-text, on-device camera for wound photos) are exclusive to the iPad app. Practices where physicians use Android phones or Windows tablets should consider Kareo, which is fully browser-based with no native mobile app.
Can I switch from Kareo to DrChrono (or vice versa) without losing patient data?
Both platforms support standard data migration via CCD/CCDA export of patient demographics, problem lists, medication histories, and allergies. Historical encounter notes and billing claims require manual export and are typically not fully migrated in a system switch. Plan for 60–90 days of parallel operations during transition to avoid gaps in billing continuity.

Our Top Pick

DrChrono — Our Pick for Mobile-First Independent Practices

DrChrono's native iPad EHR is the most intuitive mobile documentation platform for outpatient practices, with a lower entry price and flexible plan tiers. Try it free for 30 days.

Try DrChrono Free for 30 Days

* Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.